The term "unbeliever" is sometimes not particularly helpful and potentially misleading. It wrongly suggests that some people don't hold beliefs, while others choose some or other belief as an optional "add-on" to the facts of existence. In this paradigm, it is unsurprising that people would dismiss "belief" or "faith" as superfluous. More truthfully, however, we should recognise that all people have beliefs, though not all beliefs are necessarily "religious".
Just about everyone holds some beliefs about how we can know reality (reason, intuition, tradition, revelation, ...), what type of universe we live in (fluke, illusion, creation, ...), our identity (product of evolution, fertiliser, one with the universe, I am because we are, made in God's image, ...), our core problem (ignorance, desire, religion, evil spirits, rebellion, ...), the solution (enlightenment, science, appeasement, voluntary extinction, atonement, grace, ...), and so on.
We all have basic presuppositions regarding these key questions of life, and to do so is to hold beliefs. Even the sceptic lives life making some assumptions about the reality in which she lives and about how knowledge does and does not work. People never move from unbelief to belief or vice-versa, but rather from one set of beliefs to another. Everyone's a believer.
Friday, August 07, 2009
Everyone's a believer
Kevin and I have attended a group called TGIF a number of times. This is a group of philisophically minded people who meet at various venues in Joburg and Pretoria to listen to a short presentation on a variety of thought-provoking topics and discuss these, largely from a Christian perspective. The organiser of these events, Thorsten, normally precedes the weekly TGIF email-update with something similarly thought-provoking and I appreciated what he wrote this week:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
While I agree with him that everyone has beliefs, I think his underlying assumption is that all beliefs are right and good. This is a dangerous statement, assuming everyone acted upon his or her given belief. Perhaps it doesn't matter what you believe, so long as you keep it to yourself. But, then, are we really prepared to say that it is okay to sincerely believe in that which is not true? Do we care for truth? I no longer say "I believe in God." I say I know that God is true, He is real. Thanks for your post.
I dealt with this issue in two postgraduate theses. Faith is commonly equated with worldview (or: vision, or: values). In that case, everyone is a believer. David Bosch, for instance, wrote about the impossibility of not believing, and it is an important point. However, I think that this is a matter of definition of terms, of drawing distinctions.
Cori,
Thanks for sharing this e-mail. Give Thorsten my thanks, too, and let him know that I appreciated his astute and well-articulated thoughts.
Carole,
Thanks for letting me know about this post. He made the point much better than I have. However, I don't see where Thorsten is assuming all beliefs are good much less true (if the true and the good can be distinguished). I do agree that beliefs per se are of little value unless they are indeed true. So does Paul. (1 Cor. 15:19)
I have also responded to your post at Kevin's.
carole said: are we really prepared to say that it is okay to sincerely believe in that which is not true?
....and how do we know what is true? You say God is true. I do not share your sentiment. How do we determine which of us holds the truth? Indeed *can* we determine anything of the sort?
BTW - Saying that everyone has beliefs is like saying that every living person breaths. OK, its a true statement but it leaves a very 'so what' feeling behind don't you think?
Semantics, of course - but also an eye-opener for people who think that faith if purely a religious thing. We all live by faith, and yes, in many ways we're all believers. You can back up your beliefs with scientific proof and/or personal testimony. Scientific proof is not always available. I can not proof that my wife loves me, I nevertheless believe (know!) that it is true and I can assure you that she exists (even though you've never met her - which is really a pity by the way). ;-)
Thanks for all these thought-provoking comments.
I like what you say Carole about not saying you believe in God but saying that God is true and real. Of course, as Cyberkitten points out, how do we determine what is true and real?
From what I know of Thorsten he quite strongly believes that certain beliefs are more right or good than others, as do I. But I think the important premise here is that everyone comes to the table with beliefs and assumptions. In other words, everyone comes with a degree of faith based on something which can't necessarily be proven. I think it's Steven Pinker who writes that there are so many logical possibilities to every choice that we are constantly making gut-feeling responses to things as the human brain doesn't have the capacity to really sort through the magnitude of information available to us.
I also get what you're saying,Cyberkitten when you, "so what?". I guess in many circles people from across the theist-atheist spectrum realise that their beliefs are based on a certain amount of assumptions and reqire a degree of faith but I know of others who still believe their understanding of reality somehow transcends assumption and faith because they have managed to stumble onto a logical or rational argument or set of evidence that is somehow absolute.
I don't know if this makes sense! Perhaps Paulhas already said it better than I have here!
Post a Comment