In Christian circles there has been a lot of talk around protecting the nuclear family. Perhaps it is less today than it was ten years ago, but nevertheless there is the assumption that the family unit of mom, dad and kids living in their independent house in the suburbs is an ideal that needs to be protected. Yet I question whether the nuclear family is a Biblical concept at all and I further question whether living in nuclear family units is necessarily the best social set up for us.
Interestingly, a very cursory internet research on the nuclear family shows that the idea of the nuclear family is argued to be necessary for the survival of the human species, to support certain political and economic systems, such as democracy and capitalism, societal ideals such as the American dream, the industrial revolution, the British aristocracy, and the maintenance of ideological roles of men, women and children. None of these are particularly Biblical.
According to Wikipedia, the idea of the nuclear family became prominent in Western Europe with the arrival of early capitalism because it was a financially viable social unit. Further, “after the Second World War the United States experienced a renewed interest in 'the home' and building family units. The family unit became a symbol of security and a return to traditional gender roles”. The popularity of the nuclear family came about, in part, through business practices of people such as Henry Ford and the policies of Franklin Roosevelt.
But outside of the West, and prior to the 20th century, the vast majority of the world’s population have lived in a variety of set ups other than the nuclear family. Interestingly, the West is also moving away from the concept of nuclear families towards such things as blended families, binuclear families (separated spouses marrying new spouses with children), and single-parent families. “Today nuclear families with the original biological parents constitute roughly 24.1% of households” (Wikipedia).
While some may see this shift in the West as a negative thing I experience it very positively. The short period (some 100 years) that a small sector of the world’s population (Western Europe and the US) lived in nuclear family units, which originally originated due to political, ideological and economic influences, has had its pros and cons. However, to hold onto it as some sort of Biblical or Christian ideal seems it may be misguided. Its origins are not Biblical nor are its ideals.
6 comments:
Hi Cori. This is a very interesting idea. Do you have any thoughts as to what would work better and be more biblical?
Thanks
Hello Cori. I stumbled upon your blog for the first time tonight. The quotes by Roy etc. in your right hand column are nice. But the world I know (as an urban minister) is vicious, hard. Are you part of that kind of world? How do you fit the two together? Kindest regards.
Not sure what definition you might be using for "nuclear family" but assuming it is husband/wife centered it's about as biblical a concept as they come.
"For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh." Gen 2:24
I'm with Jenny on this one, what's more biblical?
Thanks for all the good questions! Annd thanks to Jenny and Thomas for stopping by!
On the question of a better or more Biblical model than the current western, individual nuclear family model, things that come to mind are living in community and extended family groups. Soemone mentioned to me the other day that in Biblical times a household would probably have referred to some 100 people! But I'll be blogging about this at greater length at a later stage.
Thomas, I attended a fantastic talk by Jim Paul from L'Abri which can be downloaded here: http://www.labri.za.org. In this talk he speaks of how we live in both the reality of the fall and the reality of redemption - the one is cruel and hard, as you describe, and the other full of hope and new life. Real reality lies in being able to hold both together and continue to have faith in the God who is making all things new. I think that if we are only living in the cynicism we have lost the good news we are called to proclaim. But we can also not close our eyes to the tremendous suffering all around, and within us.
Thanks for the thoughts, Cori; you certainly are making us think about our presuppositions. However, I think there is biblical evidence advocating what we call a "nuclear family." In addition to Gen. 2:24 (already referenced by John), check out Deut. 6:7, Eph. 6:1-4, 1 Tim. 3:4-5, 1 Pet. 3:1-7, 1 Cor. 7:12-14, and Acts 18:2. These passages indicate the biblical model of husband and wife dwelling together and having special responsibilities toward one another, and with their children dwelling with them and being raised by their parents to honor the Lord.
Your suggestion that whole communities should live together is thought-provoking and I certainly do think that communities should be unified (particularly communities of believers, such as in Acts 2), but I believe the overwhelming majority of biblical evidence indicates that what we call a "household" is usually comprised of the nuclear family (parents and children). I look forward to your further thoughts on this.
Thanks, Anonymous, for these many helpful references. The Bible certainly says a lot about how husband, wife and children should interact, pointing to the importance of the family structure.
The challenge is to understand this within the context of those times, and apply it within our own context in such as way that the 'widows and orphans', or divorced people, single people, single-parent households, children in households where both parents work etc, are truly well cared for.
Thanks for deepening the dialogue!
Post a Comment